/gfx Live RSS feed for /gfx en'; /gfx/res/7286.html#7994 /gfx/res/7286.html#7992 /gfx/res/7286.html#7991 >>7990
Something to note in the above image is that the new A.I. higher resolution images you can now see swirling either on the surface of, or just under the skin of her breasts that converges on the nipples.
In addition to this swirling pattern, the rib cage is also glowing. This isn't so distinctive with Eufrat, as her rib cage is not easily seen. But other models with prominent rib cages show this feature really well.

]]> /gfx/res/7286.html#7990 /gfx/res/7286.html#7989 They can last up to several minutes after they have been formed and more often than not become wider before eventually fading away.
The best explanation I have is that they are possibly held by the Earth's magnetic field if they are indeed connected to some sort of electromagnetism. That would explain why they do not drift in the wind as smoke does.

]]> /gfx/res/7286.html#7988 >>7987
Yes, but what is your excuse?

]]> /gfx/res/7286.html#7987
]]> /gfx/res/7286.html#7986 I say this because even though the camera moves position, the beams do not.
This firmly rules out the possibility that the features are images embedded in the camera sensor data as they would appear in the same place on the image frame. These remain anchored in the same place regardless of the camera's position, and so must be actual physical remnants of the beams.

This image also shows the remarkable swirling effect on her right breast and subtly glowing rib structure. I had to greatly over-enhance this area when I last examined these pictures just to show these features as they were so dim. Again, I'm now more confident than ever that these are all part of the dynamic that creates the beams.

]]> /gfx/res/7286.html#7985 >>7785

This image was taken a few frames after post #7785 and is a wider view of the area around Eufrat. In the earlier post, I had to overexpose most of it in order to highlight the extremely faint details.
In this image, the features are more clearly seen without the need for so much processing. The "Bubble" that can be seen expanding away from Eufrat in the first image at around 8-10ft distant appears to have expanded in the second image, some 8 seconds later, to around 20ft, suggesting an expansion rate of around 1ft per second.
The very bright bubble that is behind Eufrat in the first image, connected by a luminous tail, is not present in the second image. However, there are numerous bubbles in this image (I count at least 5!) and so could be any one of these. Why it initially appeared so bright is again unknown.
As the initial large bubble expanded outwards, so has the area of mist that envelopes the entire area. This has no structure and appears almost like a cloud or mist.
With the newer imaging technology, I can now count at least 9 beams pointing in different directions, but all originating from a single point source. This point source moves up and down the stairs that Eufrat is standing on, and originates from the same area and height that her tits occupied, or did occupy.
Again, if these beams were lens flares, they would point back to the source of light that created them and not to a single person.

]]> /gfx/res/7286.html#7983 >>7906
Hello,

In answer to your statement, yes, it could be light produced by the sun, interior/exterior lighting, etc. But from what I've observed, the very precise alignment of the beams, flares, and bubbles, in my view, rules that theory out.
Lens flares, for example, usually align with the point source of light and are pretty predictable.
I've even run images containing many lens flares through the computer using the same settings and sensitivities, but what appears in the final image is exactly what is in the original. (See Attached)
The beams and bubbles that appear in these images do not align with a point source of light; rather, they are perfectly aligned with the model's tits, or in the case of bubbles, are often seen drifting randomly around the model. Moreover, these structures do not appear in the visible image as flares do and only show up via deep image processing.

The admittedly amateurish study that Thomas and I have done with our own model proved that whatever is appearing on images of these women has something to do with electromagnetism, and/or the interaction of the women and the planet's magnetic field.

I had been promoted out of the department where I was able to use the instruments and computers, so my investigations had to cease. However, I've since returned to the department (in part thanks to Donald Trump!), and I'm able to use the equipment again. It's had several upgrades since I last used it, and it's now more sensitive, detecting elements such as argon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen. It's also been enhanced with A.I., so it takes care of some of the work I'm unable to do manually. I'm still not authorised to use this "officially", so my postings here will be on a when-able basis.

So, I revisited the well-known photo shoot that Eufrant did in some woods and in an abandoned building, as the outburst she had here seemed very vivid when I last processed these images. I use this particular model to study because of the many hundreds that I've looked at over the last 5 years; she is the most consistent in producing bright beams and bubbles. Also, I think many cameras at this time began to be able to capture many wavelengths of light other than the standard RGB.

Hopefully, with the following images, I can convince you that what appears in the images is not only real, but is 100% associated with the model and not an artefact caused by the camera lens or lighting.

]]> /gfx/res/7286.html#7981 /gfx/res/7286.html#7980 /gfx/res/7286.html#7979 /gfx/res/7286.html#7978 /gfx/res/7286.html#7977