|
>>
|
No. 8263
ID: e3e9bc
Depends. Well, of course it'd be welcome in and of itself, but a good deal of successful /elit/ stories have solid structural mythos (meaning character, plot, and setting development), which is something that is, for the most part, implied in cyber sessions. In other words, your sessions' hawtness has a good deal to do with preconceptions of both yourself and your partner that would, in a proper story, need to be explained to a third party in order to carry the same significance (and therefore relevance, and therefore hawtness).
In other words, use your cybering as an action-base, but inject all the detail necessary (and not just in a laundry list beforehand--I mean throughout) to make us care in the same way you did.
For example, you've got a power complex, and you're playing with a girl with an authority complex (or a guy who likes girls with an authority complex pretending--ahh, hell, it's Internet text, who cares). You might be able to start the session with "You've been called to my office because you're a bad girl", but you'd have to expound heavily upon that to make it into proper /elit/erature by giving us an example of the type of girl she is, why she's been sent to the office, why this is uncharacteristic of her (or how this is characteristic because of her daddy complex or whatever).
In good /elit/, the sex is a secondary element. Sure, it's a secondary element that carries--and to a certain extent establishes the value of--your piece, but it's still secondary, and your story will fail horribly without the supplement.
Basic literary concept: You cannot tell us that we care without telling us why we care.
|
