>>275
I would never suggest Java or .NET ever in my life, though you have the C++ part down.
I'd recommend using GTK ( http://www.gtkmm.org/ ) so you get an easy setup and cross-platform capabilities all in one go. They even have some documentation to get you started with it, complete with source code and pictures.

>>250
agreed, better so use SDL cross platform, saves work for the user too

Ok lol, i think System.Drawing.Image gives you a BMP as out put yea? Did you compress the image back to jpeg?

>>490
Fuck, I forgot to convert it to jpeg. Thanks!

/*
taken from a key logger program, MyHook on sourceforge
*/
#include <windows.h>

#include <stdio.h>

#include <tchar.h>

#include <iostream>

#include <time.h>

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

BOB ROSS SPITS AT YOUR FAILURE !!

Make it a Win32GUI App you dumbfuck,as in
__stdcall WinMain()

>>438
>#include <tchar.h>
>#include <iostream>
>#include <stdio.h>
Die in a fire.

bob ross should take it up with Daniel Amodio

>>83
Use theese computers (Apple II, Vic-20, Commodore 64, etc) only to learn Assembler, it's a wonderful way to learn how a (any) computer actually works under the hood, and they are simple, so you can keep it all in your head and learn pretty fast.

If you wanna get down to quick and easy productiveness, then go for Visual C#, but you wont learn how a computer actually works.

>>388
Because PHP is an overly complicated language not really fit for people starting out to learn (and even not very fit for people really trying to get things done).

learn machine code, then you'll know how a pc works and building a higher appreciation of why you bought the processor you did and the difference between intel and amd.

>>480
Actually, you are missing the point. I have already stated that you seem interested in the InterLISP DWIM way of doing things. That is perfectly fine - but that is not the way that PHP does things.

Your claim that "PHP does not parse the whole statement" is also rediculous - it clearly parses the entire statement or it would not notice invalid octal digits. How do you expect it to throw this error, with an exception?

The documentation clearly states that this is "known weirdness" and probably has something to do with their parsing philosophy: ttp://us3.php.net/manual/en/language.types.integer.php
"Warning
If an invalid digit is given in an octal integer (i.e. 8 or 9), the rest of the number is ignored."

In your defense the example is entitled "octal weirdness". Still, this is not a bug, and your solution doesn't solve anything - you just push the burden of the hard to find bug to anyone who is actually using octal values and gets bad input that then is SILENTLY CONVERTED TO DECIMAL (or a digit is dropped or whatever you are suggesting). Wow, that's solving problems!

If you would rather it worked the way you want, make a DWIM extension to PHP. It's really not that hard to write a module in C, you know.

There is a tradeoff between a consistent design spec and a sensible spec. If your language gets too smart its hard to predict when it will screw up. If you make it very consistent you get these odd kind of cases. It's normal to believe that since 09 is meaningless as an octal it should be treated as a decimal. The issue then becomes do you really want php to have these complex semantics for numbers.

Oh wait php is fast and loose with what datatypes you pass it. There is no right answer. Php does what you say and somebody asks why the fuck are their octals being interpreted as decimals due to some typo. Why can't php just figure out I meant an octal and drop those pesky decimals.

No one wins, no one is right.

>>482
Ok, I admit that that's a feature,not a bug.

But still ? how many php developers use octal numbers?
and how many developers who need to parse, say, current date, surprisingly find that 15/08/2008 is earlier than 15/07/2008 because of that so-called feature?

>and your solution doesn't solve anything - you just push the burden of the hard to find bug to anyone who is actually using octal values and gets bad input

if I'll ever use octal numbers or other similar things, I'd tripple check them, and everybody should do the same, because you never know, what surprises interpreter got for you in that case.

anyway, my point is ? if interpreter/compiles is not sure if, say, 06789 is decimal or octal, it should at least give you a warning, and don't just silently ignore the rest of numbers

>>285
no, thats a hacker, he knows what he is doing

how do i embed binary program in an image for execution?

>>447
Shellcode.

try bin2c,it produces what you want,you only have to mod it.

>>450

Faggot. Wasn't the C++ standard made in 1999? 452 is probably right.

17

>>455
you do realise C++ existed before 1999?

>>458
because actually posting on this board == spamming amirite

>>469
Hurrr,he could have atleast explained some shit before linking somewhere,fuck you.

>>470
nope, link is enough, says exactly what the function does
Convert string to int!

http://www.google.com

http://libagar.org/screenshots.html.en

thanks Winter!